UNITED STATES

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1 to

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

Or

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 333-177592

Global Medical REIT Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 202-524-6851

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed third fiscal quarter, there was no active public trading market for the registrant’s common stock.

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $0 on June 30, 2015.

As of March 21, 2016 there were 1,426,656 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value of $0.001 per share outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Global Medical REIT Inc. is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2016 (the “Original Filing”), to include the prior year consolidated financial information required by Rule 8-02 of Regulation S-X. This Amendment includes our audited consolidated results of operations and cash flow information for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 within Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 consolidated financial statements and footnotes within Item 8. “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

On March 20, 2015, we filed a Transition Report on Form 10-KT for the year ended December 31, 2014, as we changed our fiscal year from August 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2014. This change in fiscal year was required based upon our intention to qualify and be taxed as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes. As a result, our 2014 fiscal period was shortened from twelve months to a four-month transition period that ended on December 31, 2014. Accordingly, the Original Filing included our audited consolidated financial results for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 and for the four-month transition period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

This Amendment also includes updated Subsequent Event information in Note 11 - “Subsequent Events” that was included in our Original Filing from March 21, 2016 through March 31, 2016 to correspond with the date of the filing of our Registration Statement on Form S-11 on April 1, 2016. This Amendment does not amend or otherwise update any other information included in our Original Filing.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, healthcare facility performance and results of operations, among others, contain forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology including, but not limited to, “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.

Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:

While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this Report, except as required by applicable law. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements that are based on information currently available to us or the third parties making the forward-looking statements.

CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT

When this Report uses the words “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company,” they refer to Global Medical REIT Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

“ZH International Holdings Limited” (formerly known as “Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd.”) is a Hong Kong company which owns or controls ZH USA, LLC, our majority stockholder.

“ZH USA, LLC” (formerly known as “HFE USA, LLC”) is a Delaware limited liability company owned by ZH International Holdings Limited. ZH USA, LLC is our majority stockholder.

“Inter-American Management” refers to Inter-American Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned or controlled by an affiliate of ZH USA, LLC.

“SEC” and the “Commission” refer to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Common stock” refers to the common shares in our capital stock.

Our consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars (US $) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

“Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015” refers to the Company’s twelve month audited period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.

“Four months ended December 31, 2014” refers to the Company’s four month audited transition period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

PART I

Organization

Global Medical REIT Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated in the state of Nevada on March 18, 2011 under the name Scoop Media, Inc. (“Scoop Media”), which was acquired by the Hong Kong company ZH International Holdings Limited (formerly known as Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd.) in 2013. The Company changed to its current name effective January 6, 2014 in connection with its re-domestication into a Maryland corporation and change of strategy to focus on the acquisition and leasing of licensed purpose-built healthcare facilities.

On June 29, 2015, Joy Town Inc., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, acquired a controlling interest in Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. On September 7, 2015, Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. changed its name to ZH International Holdings Limited.

ZH International Holdings Limited, is a Hong Kong listed company engaged in real estate development, investments, management and sales, hospitality management and investments and REIT management. ZH International Holdings Limited owns ZH USA, LLC, (formerly known as HFE USA, LLC) the Company’s majority stockholder. As of December 31, 2015, ZH USA, LLC owned an aggregate of 248,825 (or 99.5%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

On March 14, 2016, the Company formed an operating partnership subsidiary through which the Company intends to hold substantially all of its assets and conduct substantially all of its operations and investment activities going forward.

Overview

We are a Maryland corporation engaged primarily in the acquisition and leasing of licensed, state-of-the-art, purpose-built healthcare facilities in select markets with leading clinical operators with dominant market share. We are externally managed and advised by Inter-American Management LLC, our advisor (the “Advisor”), which is an entity owned or controlled by an affiliate of ZH USA, LLC. Our management team has significant healthcare, real estate and public real estate investment trust, or REIT, experience and has long-established relationships with a wide range of healthcare providers, which we believe will provide us a competitive advantage in sourcing growth opportunities that produce attractive risk-adjusted returns.

We believe that the aging of America in conjunction with the expansion of health insurance is increasing the need for specialized healthcare facilities leased to premier practice groups, healthcare systems and corporate providers that will capture the growth in age-related procedures. These leading medical operators require state-of-the-art facilities that through their technology and design enhance the quality of care provided and improve clinical outcomes for patients. We seek to invest in these purpose-built, specialized facilities, such as surgery centers, specialty hospitals and outpatient treatment centers, in order to align with contemporary trends in the delivery of best healthcare practices. Our healthcare facilities are leased to established providers that, through clinical expertise and strong management, operate sustainable and dominant practices. We target markets with high demand for premium healthcare services, and within those markets, assets that are strategically located to take advantage of the decentralization of healthcare. We believe that our investment in the confluence of state-of-the-art medical facilities, market dominant tenant-operators and strategic sub-markets enhances clinical outcomes and provides attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders.

Our healthcare facilities are typically fully leased, or under contract to be leased, under long-term triple-net leases on the date of purchase. We may acquire existing healthcare facilities under sale-leaseback or similar arrangements, or we may contract to purchase facilities under development that are being built to an operator’s specifications. Most of our tenant-operators are physician group tenant-operators, community hospital tenant-operators and corporate medical treatment chain operators that are leading clinical operators in the markets they serve.

For details about our portfolio of assets, refer to Item 2. – “Properties” herein.

Our Objectives and Growth Strategy

Our principal business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders through a combination of (i) sustainable and increasing rental income that allows us to pay reliable, increasing dividends, and (ii) potential long-term appreciation in the value of our healthcare facilities and common stock. Our primary strategies to achieve our business objective are to:

We believe that healthcare facilities with the following technological and design characteristics, which are generally consistent with our current portfolio, will enable us to achieve strong risk-adjusted returns:

Financing Strategy:

The primary objective of our financing strategy is to maintain financial flexibility with a prudent capital structure using retained cash flows, long-term debt and the issuance of common and preferred stock to finance our growth. We seek to manage our balance sheet by maintaining prudent financial ratios and leverage levels. We intend to (i) achieve opportunistic and reasonable debt service with leverage that initially approaches approximately 60% of the fair market value of our healthcare facilities, and lower ratios as we grow our equity capital base, (ii) establish a secured revolving credit facility to finance acquisitions in concert with other debt instruments, (iii) create staggered debt maturities that are aligned to our expected average lease term, positioning us to re-price parts of our capital structure as our rental rates change with market conditions, (iv) achieve easier and faster access to the equity capital markets using a shelf registration statement once we are eligible to use Form S-3, which we expect to occur in August 2016, and (v) access international capital to avoid market cycle shortages and enhance acquisition expediency. We are not subject to any limitations on the amount of leverage we may use, and accordingly, the amount of leverage we use may be significantly less or greater than we currently anticipate.

Healthcare Industry and Healthcare Real Estate Market Opportunity

We believe the U.S. healthcare industry is continuing its rapid pace of growth due to increasing healthcare expenditures, favorable demographic trends, evolving patient preferences and recently enacted government initiatives. Furthermore, we believe these factors are contributing to the increasing need for healthcare providers to enhance the delivery of healthcare by, among other things, integrating real estate solutions that focus on higher quality, more efficient and conveniently located patient care.

U.S. Healthcare Spending Expected to Increase 5.8% per Year over Next Decade

According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, healthcare spending was approximately 17.5% of U.S. gross domestic product, or GDP, in 2014. The anticipated continuing increase in demand for healthcare services, together with an evolving complex and costly regulatory environment, changes in medical technology and reductions in government reimbursements are expected to pressure capital-constrained healthcare providers to find cost effective solutions for their real estate needs.

We believe the demand of healthcare providers for healthcare facilities will increase as health spending in the United States continues to increase.

Aging U.S. Population Driving Increase in Demand for Healthcare Services

The general aging of the population, driven by the baby boomer generation and advances in medical technology and services which increase life expectancy, is a key driver of the growth in healthcare expenditures. We believe that demographic trends in the United States, including in particular an aging population, will result in continued growth in the demand for healthcare services, which in turn will lead to an increasing need for a greater supply of modern, well-located healthcare facilities.

Between 2015 and 2060, the U.S. population over 65 years of age is projected to more than double from 47.8 million to nearly 98.2 million and the 85 and older population is expected to more than triple, from 6.3 million to 19.7 million. The number of older Americans is also growing as a percentage of the total U.S. population with the number of persons older than 65 estimated to comprise 14.9% of the total U.S. population in 2015 and projected to grow to 23.6% by 2060.

Affordable Care Act Driving Increase in Insured Americans

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or Affordable Care Act, represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of healthcare regulations and health insurance and requires every American to have health insurance or be subjected to a tax. The percentage of insured Americans has increased significantly since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. The number of uninsured Americans decreased from 44.2 million in 2013 to 35.5 million in 2014, a decrease of 24.5%. HHS predicts that the Affordable Care Act will result in an additional 35 million Americans having health insurance by 2020, which we believe will increase the frequency of physician office visits. Accordingly, we believe the increased demand for healthcare services will result in the need for healthcare providers to invest in the expansion of medical, outpatient and smaller specialty outpatient-oriented hospital facilities.

Clinical Care Continues to Shift to Outpatient Facilities

We believe the continued shift in the delivery of healthcare services to outpatient facilities will increase the need for smaller, more specialized and efficient hospitals and outpatient facilities that more effectively accommodate those services. Procedures traditionally performed in hospitals, such as certain types of surgery, are increasingly moving to outpatient facilities driven by advances in clinical science, shifting consumer preferences, limited or inefficient space in existing hospitals and lower costs in the outpatient environment. Additionally, studies by the American Hospital Association show that outpatient visits per thousand have grown approximately 50.8% from 1993 to 2013, whereas inpatient admissions per thousand have declined 10.9%. This continuing shift in delivery of healthcare services to an outpatient environment increases the need for additional outpatient facilities and smaller, more specialized and efficient hospitals.

We believe that healthcare is delivered more cost effectively and with higher patient satisfaction when it is provided on an outpatient basis. We believe the Affordable Care Act, and healthcare market trends toward outpatient care will continue to push healthcare services out of larger, older, inefficient hospitals and into newer, more efficient and conveniently located outpatient facilities and smaller specialized hospitals. Increased specialization within the medical field is also driving demand for medical facilities that are purpose-built for particular specialties.

Evidence-Based Design Influencing Healthcare Real Estate

Evidence-based design, or EBD, is an increasingly recognized component of healthcare real estate. EBD demonstrates that there is an interrelatedness between the design of a healthcare facility and patient outcomes. EBD research indicates that certain design elements, such as efficient layouts, placement of sinks and bathrooms, orientation of furniture, size of hallways and uniformity of surgical rooms, have an important impact on productivity, safety, health and morale for both physicians and patients.

We believe that as EBD research becomes more widely recognized and reproduced, healthcare facilities without these design principles will be disadvantaged. We believe that leading medical providers will increasingly desire and require modern, purpose-built facilities with state of the art technology and efficient layouts, such as those that we own in our current portfolio. We believe that this positions us to outperform other healthcare facility owners over time.

Qualification as a REIT

Our business strategy is conducive to a more favorable tax structure whereby we may qualify and elect to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We plan to elect to be taxed as REIT under U.S. federal income tax laws commencing with our contemplated taxable year ending December 31, 2016. We believe that, commencing with 2016, we will have been organized and have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under all of the federal income tax laws, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. We, however, cannot provide assurances that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

In order to qualify as a REIT, a substantial percentage of the Company’s assets must be qualifying real estate assets and a substantial percentage of the Company’s income must be rental revenue from real property or interest on mortgage loans. We must elect under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) to be treated as a REIT. Subject to a number of significant exceptions, a corporation that qualifies as a REIT generally is not subject to U.S. federal corporate income taxes on income and gains that it distributes to its stockholders, thereby reducing its corporate level taxes.

Competition

Our healthcare facilities often face competition from nearby hospitals and other healthcare facilities that provide comparable services. Similarly, our tenant-operators face competition from other medical practices and service providers at nearby hospitals and other healthcare facilities. From time to time and for reasons beyond our control, managed-care organizations may change their lists of preferred hospitals or in-network physicians. Physicians also may change hospital affiliations. If competitors of our tenant-operators or competitors of the associated healthcare delivery systems with which our healthcare facilities are strategically aligned have greater geographic coverage, improve access and convenience to physicians and patients, provide or are perceived to provide higher quality services, recruit physicians to provide competing services at their facilities, expand or improve their services or obtain more favorable managed-care contracts, our tenant-operators may not be able to successfully compete. Any reduction in rental revenues resulting from the inability of our tenant-operators or the associated healthcare delivery systems with which our healthcare facilities are strategically aligned to compete in providing medical services and/or receiving sufficient rates of reimbursement for healthcare services rendered may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our common stock.

Government Regulation

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by U.S. federal, state and local governmental authorities. Our tenant-operators generally will be subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, and certification for participation in government programs, billing for services, privacy and security of health information and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. In addition, new laws and regulations, changes in existing laws and regulations or changes in the interpretation of such laws or regulations could negatively affect our financial condition and the financial condition of our tenant-operators. These changes, in some cases, could apply retroactively. The enactment, timing or effect of legislative or regulatory changes cannot be predicted.

Many states regulate the construction of healthcare facilities, the expansion of healthcare facilities, the construction or expansion of certain services, including by way of example specific bed types and medical equipment, as well as certain capital expenditures through certificate of need, or CON, laws. Under such laws, the applicable state regulatory body must determine a need exists for a project before the project can be undertaken. If one of our tenant-operators seeks to undertake a CON-regulated project, but is not authorized by the applicable regulatory body to proceed with the project, the tenant-operator would be prevented from operating in its intended manner.

 Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could adversely affect us directly and our tenant-operators’ ability to make rent payments to us, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our common stock.

Fraud and Abuse Laws

There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our lease arrangements with certain tenant-operators may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws.

These laws include without limitation:

Violations of these laws may result in criminal and/or civil penalties that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, the Affordable Care Act clarifies that the submission of claims for items or services generated in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim under the False Claims Act. The federal government has taken the position, and some courts have held, that violations of other laws, such as the Stark Law, can also be a violation of the False Claims Act. Additionally, certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenant-operators or strategic partners could jeopardize that tenant-operator’s ability to operate or to make rent payments or affect the level of occupancy in our healthcare facilities, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our common stock. Further, we enter into leases and other financial relationships with healthcare delivery systems that are subject to or impacted by these laws. In the future we may have other investors who are healthcare providers in certain of our subsidiaries that own our healthcare facilities. If any of our relationships, including those related to the other investors in our subsidiaries, are found not to comply with these laws, we and our physician investors may be subject to civil and/or criminal penalties.

Environmental Matters

Under various U.S. federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, current and prior owners and tenant-operators of real estate may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigating, remediating and monitoring certain hazardous substances or other regulated materials on or in such healthcare facility. In addition to these costs, the past or present owner or tenant-operator of a healthcare facility from which a release emanates could be liable for any personal injury or property damage that results from such releases, including for the unauthorized release of asbestos-containing materials and other hazardous substances into the air, as well as any damages to natural resources or the environment that arise from such releases. These environmental laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the current or prior owner or tenant-operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or release of such substances or materials. Moreover, the release of hazardous substances or materials, or the failure to properly remediate such substances or materials, may adversely affect the owner’s or tenant’s ability to lease, sell, develop or rent such healthcare facility or to borrow by using such healthcare facility as collateral. Persons who transport or arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or other regulated materials may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, regardless of whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person.

Certain environmental laws impose compliance obligations on owners and tenant-operators of real property with respect to the management of hazardous substances and other regulated materials. For example, environmental laws govern the management and removal of asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint. Failure to comply with these laws can result in penalties or other sanctions. If we are held liable under these laws, our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

Medicare and Medicaid Programs

Sources of revenue for our tenant-operators typically include the U.S. federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance payors and health maintenance organizations. Healthcare providers continue to face increased government and private payor pressure to control or reduce healthcare costs and significant reductions in healthcare reimbursement, including reduced reimbursements and changes to payment methodologies under the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office, or CBO, estimates the reductions required by the Affordable Care Act in the future will include cuts to Medicare fee-for-service payments, the majority of which will come from hospitals, and that some hospitals will become insolvent as a result of the reductions. In some cases, private insurers rely on all or portions of the Medicare payment systems to determine payment rates which may result in decreased reimbursement from private insurers. The Affordable Care Act will likely increase enrollment in plans offered by private insurers who choose to participate in state-run exchanges, but the Affordable Care Act also imposes new requirements for the health insurance industry, including prohibitions upon excluding individuals based upon pre-existing conditions which may increase private insurer costs and, thereby, cause private insurers to reduce their payment rates to providers. At this time, it is difficult to predict the full effects of the Affordable Care Act and its impact on our business, our revenues and financial condition and those of our tenant-operators due to the law’s complexity, lack of implementing regulations or interpretive guidance, gradual implementation and possible amendment. The Affordable Care Act could adversely affect the reimbursement rates received by our tenant-operators, the financial success of our tenant-operators and strategic partners and consequently us.

If the United States economy enters a recession or slower growth, this could negatively affect state budgets, thereby putting pressure on states to decrease spending on state programs including Medicaid. The need to control Medicaid expenditures may be exacerbated by the potential for increased enrollment in state Medicaid programs due to unemployment and declines in family incomes. Historically, states have often attempted to reduce Medicaid spending by limiting benefits and tightening Medicaid eligibility requirements. Potential reductions to Medicaid program spending in response to state budgetary pressures could negatively impact the ability of our tenant-operators to successfully operate their businesses.

Efforts by payors to reduce healthcare costs will likely continue which may result in reductions or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenant-operators. A reduction in reimbursements to our tenant-operators from third-party payors for any reason could adversely affect our tenant-operators’ ability to make rent payments to us which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our common stock.

Employees

As of March 21, 2016, we had no employees. The Company is externally managed by the Advisor. The Advisor provides the services of the officers and other management personnel of the Company.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item 1A within this Report.

None.

Our business office is located at 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 450, Bethesda MD, 20814. The office space is allocated to us from the Advisor at prevailing rental rates and terms.

Properties Owned as of December 31, 2015

Tennessee Facilities

On December 31, 2015, the Company acquired a six building, 52,266 square foot medical clinic portfolio for a purchase price of $20.0 million (approximately $20.2 including legal and related fees). Five of the facilities are located in Tennessee and one facility is located in Mississippi. The portfolio will be leased back through Gastroenterology Center of the Midsouth, P.C. via an absolute triple-net lease agreement that expires in 2027. The tenant has two successive options to renew the lease for five year periods on the same terms and conditions as the primary non-revocable lease term with the exception of rent, which will be computed at the same rate of escalation used during the fixed lease term. Base rent increases by 1.75% each lease year commencing on January 1, 2018. The property is owned in fee simple. Funding for the transaction and all related costs was received in the form of a convertible debenture (“Convertible Debenture”) the Company issued to its majority stockholder in the total amount of $20,900,000. Refer to Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

West Mifflin Facility

On September 25, 2015, the Company acquired a combined approximately 27,193 square foot surgery center and medical office building located in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania and the adjacent parking lot for approximately $11.35 million (approximately $11.6 million including legal and related fees). The facilities are operated by Associates in Ophthalmology, LTD and Associates Surgery Centers, LLC, respectively, and leased back to those entities by the Company via two separate lease agreements that expire in 2030. Each lease has two successive options by the tenants to renew for five year periods. Base rent increases by 2% each lease year commencing on October 1, 2018. The property is owned in fee simple. In connection with the acquisition of the facilities, the Company borrowed $7,377,500 from Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”) and funded the remainder of the purchase price with the proceeds from a Convertible Debenture it issued to its majority stockholder in the total amount of $4,545,838. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” and Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

Asheville Facility

On September 19, 2014, the Company acquired an approximately 8,840 square foot medical office building known as the Orthopedic Surgery Center, located in Asheville, North Carolina for approximately $2.5 million. The Asheville facility is subject to an operating lease which expires in 2017, with lease options to renew up to five years. The property is owned in fee simple. In connection with the acquisition of the Asheville facility, the Company borrowed $1.7 million from the Bank of North Carolina and funded the remainder of the purchase price with the proceeds from a Convertible Debenture it issued to its majority stockholder and with the Company’s existing cash. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

Omaha Facility

On June 5, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of a 56-bed long term acute care hospital located at 1870 S 75^th Street, Omaha, Nebraska for approximately $21.7 million (approximately $21.9 million including legal fees). The Omaha facility is operated by Select Specialty Hospital – Omaha, Inc. pursuant to a sublease which expires in 2023, with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years. The real property where the Omaha facility and other improvements are located is subject to a land lease with Catholic Health Initiatives, a Colorado nonprofit corporation (the “land lease”). The land lease initially was to expire in 2023 with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years. However, as of December 31, 2015, the Company exercised two five-year lease renewal options and therefore the land lease currently expires in 2033, subject to future renewal options by the Company. In connection with the acquisition of the Omaha facility in June 2014, the Company borrowed $15.06 million from Capital One and funded the remainder of the purchase price with funds from its majority stockholder. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

The Omaha facility’s obligations under the sublease with Select Specialty Hospital – Omaha, Inc. are fully guaranteed by its parent company, Select Medical Corporation (NYSE: SEM). Information about Select Medical Corporation, including its audited historical financial statements, can be obtained from its Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports and filings available on its website at http://www.selectmedical.com/ or on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Not applicable.

PART II

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC pink tier of the OTC Markets, Inc. under the symbol “GMRE.” Trading of our common stock has been limited and sporadic and there can be no assurance that a liquid market for our common stock will ever develop.

As of March 21, 2016 there were approximately 35 record holders, an unknown number of additional holders whose stock is held in “street name” and 1,426,656 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Effective November 7, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “common stock”), from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000 and effected a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock at the ratio of 1-for-400 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were 250,000 outstanding common shares. All references to shares of the Company’s common stock in this Report refer to the number of shares of common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split (unless otherwise indicated).

Pursuant to a previously declared dividend approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”) and in compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Company has paid a monthly dividend of $0.0852 per share, an aggregate of $21,300 per month, each month during the twelve month period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Accordingly, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $255,600. During the four months ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $85,200.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item 6.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes to those statements, included elsewhere in this Report, and the Section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Report. As discussed in more detail in the Section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” this discussion contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. 

Fiscal Year

We changed our fiscal year from August 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2014. As a result, our prior fiscal period was shortened from twelve months to a four-month transition period that ended on December 31, 2014. This change in fiscal year was required based upon our intention to qualify and be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

Overview

Global Medical REIT Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated in the state of Nevada on March 18, 2011 under the name Scoop Media, Inc. (“Scoop Media”), which was acquired by the Hong Kong company ZH International Holdings Limited (formerly known as Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd.) in 2013. The Company changed to its current name effective January 6, 2014 in connection with its re-domestication into a Maryland corporation and change of strategy to focus on the acquisition and leasing of licensed purpose-built healthcare facilities.

The Company’s primary investor goal is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns and maximize sustainable distributable cash flow. The Company’s principal investment strategy is to act on the opportunities created by the changing healthcare environment by acquiring, selectively developing and managing locally critical medical properties that are core to medical operator businesses and that meet the Company’s investment criteria. In general, the Company seeks to acquire or develop specialty medical properties in desirable markets with tenants who are expected to prosper in the changing healthcare delivery environment. The Company focuses on specialty medical properties, including medical office buildings, outpatient treatment and diagnostic facilities, physical group practice clinics, ambulatory surgery centers, and specialty hospitals and treatment centers. The Company has four wholly owned Delaware limited liability subsidiaries that were formed to own the facilities within the Company’s portfolio.

On June 29, 2015, Joy Town Inc., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, acquired a controlling interest in Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. On September 7, 2015, Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. changed its name to ZH International Holdings Limited.

ZH International Holdings Limited, is a Hong Kong listed company engaged in real estate development, investments, management and sales, hospitality management and investments and REIT management. ZH International Holdings Limited owns ZH USA, LLC, (formerly known as HFE USA, LLC) the Company’s majority stockholder. As of December 31, 2015, ZH USA, LLC owned an aggregate of 248,825 (or 99.5%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

On March 14, 2016, the Company entered into a series of internal agreements and transactions pursuant to which the Company has implemented an “UPREIT” operating partnership structure. The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Global Medical REIT GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “GP”), entered into an Agreement of Limited Partnership pursuant to which the Company serves as the initial limited partner, and the GP serves as the sole general partner, of the Company’s operating partnership, Global Medical REIT L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “OP”) (the “Partnership Agreement”). The Company entered into a Contribution and Assignment Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with the OP pursuant to which the Company contributed to the OP 100% of the limited liability company interests in two wholly owned subsidiaries that own certain of the Company’s properties in exchange for limited partnership units of the OP. These subsidiaries are GMR Plano, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and GMR Memphis, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The Company intends to contribute its ownership interests in the subsidiaries that own the Company’s other properties upon receipt of the required lender consents.

The Company is the sole member of the GP, which is the sole general partner of the OP. Going forward, the Company will conduct substantially all of its operations and make substantially all of its investments through the OP. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, though the GP, the Company will have full, complete and exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the OP, including the ability to cause the OP to enter into certain major transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, refinancings and selection of lessees, to make distributions to partners and to cause changes in the OP’s business activities.

Management Agreement

On November 10, 2014, we entered into a Management Agreement, with an effective date of April 1, 2014, with Inter-American Management, LLC (the “Advisor”), our affiliate. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for designing and implementing our business strategy and administering our business activities and day-to-day operations. For performing these services, we will pay the Advisor a base management fee equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum of our net asset value (the value of our assets less the value of our liabilities), or (b) $30,000 per calendar month. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, management fees of $360,000 and $120,000, respectively, were incurred and expensed by the Company, due to the Advisor, and remain unpaid as of December 31, 2015. Additionally, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company expensed $400,000 and $227,000 that were paid to the Advisor for the acquisitions of the Tennessee facilities and the West Mifflin facility, respectively. For the four months ended December 31, 2014 the Company expensed $48,400 that was paid to the Advisor related to the acquisition of the Asheville facility in September 2014.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires our management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base estimates on the best information available to us at the time, our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a more detailed discussion of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the footnotes to the accompanying financial statements. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

We plan on electing to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning in 2016. REITs are generally not subject to federal income taxes if we can meet many specific requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and we may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and if we create a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”), the TRS will be subject to federal, state and local taxes on its income at regular corporate rates. We recognize the tax effects of uncertain tax positions only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. We have not identified any material uncertain tax positions and recognize interest and penalties in income tax expense, if applicable. We are currently not under examination by any income tax jurisdiction.

Purchase of Real Estate

Transactions in which real estate assets are purchased that are not subject to an existing significant lease or are attached or related to a major healthcare provider are treated as asset acquisitions, and as such are recorded at their purchase price, including acquisition fees, which is allocated to land and building based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Investment properties that are acquired either subject to a significant existing lease or as part of a portfolio level transaction with significant leasing activity are treated as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, and as such are recorded at fair value, allocated to land, building and the existing lease, if applicable, based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition, with acquisition fees and other costs expensed as incurred. Fair value is determined based on ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, primarily based on unobservable data inputs. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating the purchase price of individually acquired properties, the Company utilizes its own market knowledge and published market data. In this regard, the Company also utilizes information obtained from county tax assessment records to assist in the determination of the fair value of the land and building. The Company utilizes market comparable transactions such as price per square foot to assist in the determination of fair value for purposes of allocating the purchase price of properties acquired as part of portfolio level transactions. The value of acquired leases, if applicable, is estimated based upon the costs we would have incurred to lease the property under similar terms.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment periodically or whenever events or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment indicator exists, we compare the expected future undiscounted cash flows against the carrying amount of an asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we would record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s operations currently consist of rental revenue earned from three tenants under leasing arrangements which provide for minimum rent, escalations, and charges to the tenant for the real estate taxes and operating expenses. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases. For operating leases with contingent rental escalators revenue is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due during the period. Revenue from leases with fixed annual rental escalators are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term, subject to a collectability assessment. If the Company determines that collectability of rents is not reasonably assured, future revenue recognition is limited to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, an allowance for estimated losses is established.

The Company consistently assesses the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for operating lease straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults, or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company also monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on a continuous basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For operating lease straight-line rent amounts, the Company's assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 no allowance was recorded as it was not deemed necessary.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The Company considers the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, escrow deposits, accounts and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time since origination or the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Results of Operations

Trends Which May Influence Results of Operations

We believe the following trends in the healthcare real estate market positively affect the acquisition, ownership, development and management of healthcare real estate:

Fiscal Year

We changed our fiscal year from August 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the prior year ended December 31, 2014. As a result our 2014 fiscal period was shortened from twelve months to an audited four-month transition period that ended on December 31, 2014. This change in fiscal year was in preparation for our anticipated election to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, in order to present a full year of operating results for 2014 we are including information regarding the audited fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 in the accompanying results of operations discussion.

Based on the facts in the preceding paragraph, we do not believe that a comparison between the audited calendar year ended December 31, 2015 results of operations, the results of operations for the audited four-month period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and the results of operations for the audited fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014; including a variance explanation related to those amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flow would be meaningful to users.

As of December 31, 2015 the Company had the following properties in its portfolio:

As of December 31, 2014 the Company had the following properties in its portfolio:

As of August 31, 2014 the Company had the following property in its portfolio:

Our revenues for these periods consisted of rent received from our healthcare facilities and our expenses consisted primarily of acquisition related expenses derived from those acquisitions as well as general and administrative expenses. Details regarding our revenues and expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the four months ended December 31, 2015, and the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014, respectively, are as follows:

Discussion of our Consolidated Results of Operations - Audited Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015 compared to Audited Four Months Ended December 31, 2014 compared to Audited Fiscal Twelve Months Ended August 31, 2014

Revenues

Total revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 were $2,061,667, which primarily consisted of $2,049,196 in rental revenue derived from our facilities.

Total revenues for the four months ended December 31, 2014 were $596,656, which primarily consisted of $596,585 in rental revenue derived from the base rental receipts from our Omaha and Asheville facilities that were acquired in June 2014 and September 2014, respectively.

Total revenues for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 were $380,405, which primarily consisted of $379,678 in rental revenue derived from the base rental receipts from our Omaha Facility.

Acquisition Fees – related party

Acquisition fees for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 of $627,000 were comprised of $400,000 and 227,000 that were expensed in connection with the acquisitions of the Tennessee and West Mifflin facilities, respectively.

Acquisition fees for the four months ended December 31, 2014 were $48,400 that was expensed in connection with the acquisition of the Asheville facility in September 2014.

Acquisition fees for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 were $434,200 that was expensed in connection with the acquisition of the Omaha Facility in June 2014.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 were $505,141. This amount primarily included professional fees and services of $214,993, general office expenses of $81,894, ground rent related to the Omaha facility of 79,892, and travel and related expenses of $74,523.

General and administrative expenses for the four months ended December 31, 2014 were $182,930. This amount included professional fees and services of $102,054, general office expenses of $67,707, and ground rent related to the Omaha facility of 44,908.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 were $20,666. This amount primarily was derived from general office expenses.

Management Fees – related party

Management fees for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 were $360,000 as provided for in the Management Agreement which became effective as of April 1, 2014.

Management fees for the four months ended December 31, 2014 were $120,000 as provided for in the Management Agreement.

Management fees for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 were $150,000 incurred as provided for in the management agreement.

Depreciation Expense

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, depreciation expense was $659,671 related to the West Mifflin, Asheville and Omaha facilities. No depreciation was recorded related to the Tennessee facilities as the acquisition closed on December 31, 2015.

For the four months ended December 31, 2014, depreciation expense was $200,499 related to the Omaha and Asheville facilities that were acquired in June 2014 and September 2014, respectively.

Depreciation expense for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 of $129,081 related to the Omaha Facility.

Interest Expense

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, interest expense of $1,519,102 results from interest incurred on our debt of $1,392,567 and the amortization of deferred financing costs in the amount of $126,535.

For the four months ended December 30, 2014, interest expense of $454,697 results from interest incurred on our debt of $415,268 and the amortization of deferred financing costs in the amount of $39,429.

Interest expense for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 of $298,664 results from interest incurred on our debt of $272,221 and the amortization of deferred financing costs in the amount of $26,443.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, maintain our assets, fund our operations and make dividend distributions to our stockholders and other general business needs. Our liquidity, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. Our near-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of purchasing our target assets, restoring and leasing properties and funding our operations.

Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the acquisition and maintenance of properties; non-recurring capital expenditures; interest and principal payments on our indebtedness discussed below; payment of quarterly dividends to our stockholders to the extent declared by our Board of Directors; and general and administrative expenses. The nature of our business, our aggressive growth plans and the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, to our stockholders, may cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over the long-term. We will seek to satisfy our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, the issuance of debt and equity securities, property dispositions, and joint venture transactions. We have financed our operations and acquisitions to date through the funding by the majority stockholder and bank loans as discussed below. We expect to meet our operating liquidity requirements generally through cash on hand and cash provided by operations (as we acquire additional real estate assets). We anticipate that cash on hand, cash provided by operations, funding from financial institutions, and funding by our majority stockholder will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our assets are illiquid by their nature. Thus, a timely liquidation of assets might not be a viable source of short-term liquidity should a cash flow shortfall arise that causes a need for additional liquidity. It could be necessary to source liquidity from other financing alternatives should any such scenario arise.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and to pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we annually distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income. Subject to the requirements of the Maryland General Corporation Law we intend to pay quarterly dividends to our stockholders, if and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors.

Cash Flow Information

Net cash used in operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was $208,801, which was primarily derived from the net loss during the fiscal year partially offset by depreciation and amortization expense, an increase in accrued expenses, and accrued management fees. Net cash provided by operating activities for the four months ended December 31, 2014 was $129,184. Net cash used in operating activities for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 was $208,880.

Net cash used in investing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was $32,338,990. Cash flows used in investing activities were derived primarily from funds used for the acquisition of our West Mifflin and Tennessee facilities. Cash flows used in investing activities are heavily dependent upon the investment in properties and real estate assets. We anticipate cash flows used in investing activities to increase as we acquire additional properties in the future. Net cash used in investing activities for the four months ended December 31, 2014 was $2,549,550. Net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 was $21,882,005.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was $41,643,255. Cash flows provided by financing activities were derived primarily from the $34.6 million funded by our majority stockholder to fund acquisitions and a loan obtained from Capital One in the amount of $7.4 million to fund the West Mifflin acquisition. We anticipate cash flows from financing activities to increase in the future as we raise additional funds from investors and incur debt to purchase properties. Net cash provided by financing activities for the four months ended December 31, 2014 was $2,483,688. Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal twelve months ended August 31, 2014 was $22,112,850.

Dividends

Pursuant to a previously declared dividend approved by the Board of Directors and in compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Company has paid a monthly dividend of $0.0852 per share, an aggregate of $21,300 per month, each month during the twelve month period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and during the four month period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Accordingly, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $255,600. During the four months ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $85,200.

The amount of the dividends to our stockholders is determined by our Board of Directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of dividends, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual dividend amount of offering proceeds that may be used to fund dividends, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make dividend distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences; or (iii) jeopardize our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect or change on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term “off-balance sheet arrangement” generally means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with the Company is a party, under which the Company has (i) any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest; or (ii) a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.

Inflation

We expect to be exposed to inflation risk as income from future long-term leases will be the primary source of our cash flows from operations. We expect there to be provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that will protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions will include negotiated rental increases, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of the anticipated leases, among other factors, the leases may not re-set frequently enough to off-set the impact of inflation.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item 7A.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Global Medical REIT Inc. 

Bethesda, MD

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Global Medical REIT Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficit) equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule III. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Global Medical REIT Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com 

Houston, Texas

March 21, 2016, except for Note 11 as to which the date is March 31, 2016

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Organization

Global Medical REIT Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated in the state of Nevada on March 18, 2011 under the name Scoop Media, Inc. (“Scoop Media”), which was acquired by the Hong Kong company ZH International Holdings Limited (formerly known as Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd.) in 2013. The Company changed to its current name effective January 6, 2014 in connection with its re-domestication into a Maryland corporation and change of strategy to focus on the acquisition and leasing of licensed purpose-built healthcare facilities.

The Company’s primary investor goal is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns and maximize sustainable distributable cash flow. The Company’s principal investment strategy is to act on the opportunities created by the changing healthcare environment by acquiring, selectively developing and managing locally critical medical properties that are core to medical operator businesses and that meet the Company’s investment criteria. In general, the Company seeks to acquire or develop specialty medical properties in desirable markets with tenants who are expected to prosper in the changing healthcare delivery environment. The Company focuses on specialty medical properties, including medical office buildings, outpatient treatment and diagnostic facilities, physical group practice clinics, ambulatory surgery centers, and specialty hospitals and treatment centers. The Company has four wholly owned Delaware limited liability company subsidiaries that were formed to own the facilities within the Company’s portfolio. The wholly owned subsidiaries are as follows: GMR Memphis, LLC; GMR Pittsburgh, LLC; GMR Asheville, LLC, and GMR Omaha, LLC.

On June 29, 2015, Joy Town Inc., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, acquired a controlling interest in Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. On September 7, 2015, Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. changed its name to ZH International Holdings Limited.

ZH International Holdings Limited, is a Hong Kong listed company engaged in real estate development, investments, management and sales, hospitality management and investments and real estate investment trust (“REIT”) management. ZH International Holdings Limited owns ZH USA, LLC, (formerly known as HFE USA, LLC) the Company’s majority stockholder. As of December 31, 2015, ZH USA, LLC owned an aggregate of 248,825 (or 99.5%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year

The Company changed its fiscal year from August 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2014. As a result, the Company’s prior fiscal period was shortened from twelve months to a four-month transition period that began on September 1, 2014 and ended on December 31, 2014. The Company’s change in fiscal year was required based upon the Company’s intention to qualify and be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Consolidation Policy

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated. See Note 1 – “Organization” for the names of our wholly owned subsidiaries.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Presentation of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs as Debt Discount

On April 7, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03 entitled “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). Debt issuance costs include amounts paid to lenders and others to obtain financing and are amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan, which approximates the effective interest method. In accordance with the provisions of ASU 2015-03, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those years, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability must be reclassified and presented as a debt discount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and presented as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The application of ASU 2015-03 is required to be applied retrospectively. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-03 effective for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 represents a change in accounting principal. See Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisition” for additional details.

Income Taxes

The Company plans on electing to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning in 2016. REITs are generally not subject to federal income taxes if the Company can meet many specific requirements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal and state income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and the Company may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for subsequent tax years. Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and if the Company creates a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”), the TRS will be subject to federal, state and local taxes on its income at regular corporate rates. The Company recognizes the tax effects of uncertain tax positions only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company has not identified any material uncertain tax positions and recognizes interest and penalties in income tax expense, if applicable. The Company is currently not under examination by any income tax jurisdiction.

Purchase of Real Estate

Transactions in which real estate assets are purchased that are not subject to an existing significant lease or are attached or related to a major healthcare provider are treated as asset acquisitions, and as such are recorded at their purchase price, including acquisition fees, which is allocated to land and building based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Investment properties that are acquired either subject to a significant existing lease or as part of a portfolio level transaction with significant leasing activity are treated as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, and as such are recorded at fair value, allocated to land, building and the existing lease, if applicable, based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition, with acquisition fees and other costs expensed as incurred. Fair value is determined based on ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, primarily based on unobservable data inputs. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating the purchase price of individually acquired properties, the Company utilizes its own market knowledge and published market data. In this regard, the Company also utilizes information obtained from county tax assessment records to assist in the determination of the fair value of the land and building. The Company utilizes market comparable transactions such as price per square foot to assist in the determination of fair value for purposes of allocating the purchase price of properties acquired as part of portfolio level transactions. The value of acquired leases, if applicable, is estimated based upon the costs we would have incurred to lease the property under similar terms.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment periodically or whenever events or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment indicator exists, we compare the expected future undiscounted cash flows against the carrying amount of an asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we would record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset.

Depreciation Expense

Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and improvements, which are generally between 5 and 40 years.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits, cashier’s checks, money market accounts and certificates of deposits with a maturity of three months to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains their cash and cash equivalents and escrow deposits at financial institutions. The combined account balances may exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation insurance coverage, and, as a result, there may be a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit. The Company does not believe that this risk is significant.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents cash required by a third party lender to be held by the Company as a reserve for debt service.

Escrow Deposits

Escrow deposits include funds held in escrow to be used for the acquisition of future properties.

Deferred Assets

The deferred asset balance of $93,646 as of December 31, 2015, consists of $23,295 in deferred rent receivable and $70,351 in deferred costs related to the Company’s securities offering. In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 340, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs,” the Company is deferring specific incremental costs directly attributable to its offering of equity securities and will charge them against the gross proceeds of the offering as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s operations currently consist of rental revenue earned from three tenants under leasing arrangements which provide for minimum rent, escalations, and charges to the tenant for the real estate taxes and operating expenses. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases. For operating leases with contingent rental escalators revenue is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due during the period. Revenue from leases with fixed annual rental escalators are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term, subject to a collectability assessment. If the Company determines that collectability of rents is not reasonably assured, future revenue recognition is limited to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, an allowance for estimated losses is established.

The Company consistently assesses the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for operating lease straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults, or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company also monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on a continuous basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For operating lease straight-line rent amounts, the Company's assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 no allowance was recorded as it was not deemed necessary.

Segment Reporting

ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting,” establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity's reportable segments. The Company has determined that they have one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in medical properties. The Company evaluates the operating performance of its investments on an individual asset level basis.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The Company considers the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, escrow deposits, accounts and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time since origination or the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Related Party Disclosures

The Company enters into transactions with affiliated entities, or “related parties,” which are recorded net as “Due to Related Parties” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Related party disclosures are governed by ASC Topic 850, “Related Party Disclosures.” Refer to Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional information regarding the Company’s related party transactions.

Net Loss Per Share

The Company calculates basic and diluted loss per share using the weighted average common shares outstanding. The Company has no issued and outstanding non-vested shares of common stock and therefore no dilutive effects of non-vested shares and accordingly the Company’s calculation and the resulting amount of basic and diluted loss per share are identical.

Reclassification

The Company reclassified $197,719 from the line item “Cash and Cash Equivalents” in its accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 into the line item “Restricted Cash” to properly reflect the Company’s funds that are restricted. The Company also reclassified $572,400 from the line item “Building and Improvements” in its accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 into the line item “Land” to properly reflect the asset balances related to the acquisition of the Asheville facility in 2014.

Note 3 – Property Portfolio

A rollforward of the gross investment in land, building and improvements as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

Properties Owned as of December 31, 2015

Tennessee Facilities

On December 31, 2015, the Company acquired a six building, 52,266 square foot medical clinic portfolio for a purchase price of $20.0 million (approximately $20.2 including legal and related fees). Five of the facilities are located in Tennessee and one facility is located in Mississippi. The portfolio will be leased back through Gastroenterology Center of the Midsouth, P.C. via an absolute triple-net lease agreement that expires in 2027. The tenant has two successive options to renew the lease for five year periods on the same terms and conditions as the primary non-revocable lease term with the exception of rent, which will be computed at the same rate of escalation used during the fixed lease term. Base rent increases by 1.75% each lease year commencing on January 1, 2018. The property is owned in fee simple. Funding for the transaction and all related costs was received in the form of a convertible debenture (“Convertible Debenture”) the Company issued to its majority stockholder in the total amount of $20,900,000. Refer to Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

West Mifflin Facility

On September 25, 2015, the Company acquired a combined approximately 27,193 square foot surgery center and medical office building located in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania and the adjacent parking lot for approximately $11.35 million (approximately $11.6 million including legal and related fees). The facilities are operated by Associates in Ophthalmology, LTD and Associates Surgery Centers, LLC, respectively, and leased back to those entities by the Company via two separate lease agreements that expire in 2030. Each lease has two successive options by the tenants to renew for five year periods. Base rent increases by 2% each lease year commencing on October 1, 2018. The property is owned in fee simple. In connection with the acquisition of the facilities, the Company borrowed $7,377,500 from Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”) and funded the remainder of the purchase price with the proceeds from a Convertible Debenture it issued to its majority stockholder in the total amount of $4,545,838. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” and Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

Asheville Facility

On September 19, 2014, the Company acquired an approximately 8,840 square foot medical office building known as the Orthopedic Surgery Center, located in Asheville, North Carolina for approximately $2.5 million. The Asheville facility is subject to an operating lease which expires in 2017, with lease options to renew up to five years. The property is owned in fee simple. In connection with the acquisition of the Asheville facility, the Company borrowed $1.7 million from the Bank of North Carolina and funded the remainder of the purchase price with the proceeds from a Convertible Debenture it issued to its majority stockholder and with the Company’s existing cash. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

Omaha Facility

On June 5, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of a 56-bed long term acute care hospital located at 1870 S 75^th Street, Omaha, Nebraska for approximately $21.7 million (approximately $21.9 million including legal fees). The Omaha facility is operated by Select Specialty Hospital – Omaha, Inc. pursuant to a sublease which expires in 2023, with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years. The real property where the Omaha facility and other improvements are located are subject to a land lease with Catholic Health Initiatives, a Colorado nonprofit corporation (the “land lease”). The land lease initially was to expire in 2023 with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years. However, as of December 31, 2015, the Company exercised two five-year lease renewal options and therefore the land lease currently expires in 2033, subject to future renewal options by the Company. In connection with the acquisition of the Omaha facility in June 2014, the Company borrowed $15.06 million from Capital One and funded the remainder of the purchase price with funds from its majority stockholder. Refer to Note 4 – “Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions” for additional details regarding the funding of this transaction.

Depreciation expense was $659,671 and $200,499 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, respectively.

For information related to property transactions that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015 refer to Note 11 – “Subsequent Events.”

Note 4 – Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions

Summary of Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions, Net of Debt Discount

As disclosed in Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” effective for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Company early adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03, which requires retrospective application. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 represents a change in accounting principle. A detail of the impact of adopting ASU 2015-03 on the Company’s Notes Payable Related to Acquisitions, net of unamortized discount balances, as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, is as follows

The Company incurred financing costs related to the Omaha, Asheville, and West Mifflin loans that are treated as debt discounts. A rollforward of the unamortized debt discount balance as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the unamortized debt discount balance as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Amortization expense is included in the “Interest Expense” line item in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

West Mifflin Note Payable

In order to finance a portion of the purchase price for the West Mifflin facility, on September 25, 2015 the Company entered into a Term Loan and Security Agreement with Capital One to borrow $7,377,500. The note bears interest at 3.72% per annum and all unpaid interest and principal is due on September 25, 2020. Interest is paid in arrears and interest payments begin on November 1, 2015, and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter. Principal payments begin on November 1, 2018 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter based on an amortization schedule with the principal balance due on the maturity date. The note may not be prepaid in whole or in part prior to September 25, 2017. Thereafter, the Company, at its option, may prepay the note at any time, in whole (but not in part) on at least thirty calendar days but not more than sixty calendar days advance written notice. The note has an early termination fee of two percent if prepaid prior to September 25, 2018. No principal payments were made for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. The note balance as of December 31, 2015 was $7,377,500. Interest expense incurred on this note was $51,078 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

As of December 31, 2015, scheduled principal payments due for each fiscal year ended December 31 are listed below as follows:

Asheville Note Payable

In order to finance a portion of the purchase price of the Asheville facility, on September 15, 2014 the Company entered into a Promissory Note with the Bank of North Carolina to borrow $1,700,000. The note bears interest on the outstanding principal balance at the simple, fixed interest rate of 4.75% per annum and all unpaid principal and interest is due on February 15, 2017. Commencing on October 15, 2014, the Company made on the 15^th of each calendar month until and including March 15, 2015, monthly payments consisting of interest only. Thereafter, commencing on April 15, 2015, the outstanding principal and accrued interest shall be payable in monthly amortizing payments on the 15^th day of each calendar month, until and including January 15, 2017. This note may be prepaid in part or in full at any time and no prepayment penalty will be assessed with respect to any amounts prepaid. The Company made principal payments in the amount of $37,899 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. No principal payments were made for the four months ended December 31, 2014. The note balance as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $1,662,101 and $1,700,000, respectively. Interest expense on this note was $81,160 and $20,188 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015, scheduled principal payments due for each fiscal year ended December 31 are listed below as follows:

Omaha Note Payable

In order to finance a portion of the purchase price for the Omaha facility, on June 5, 2014 the Company entered into a Term Loan and Security Agreement with Capital One, National Association to borrower $15,060,000. The loan bears interest at 4.91% per annum and all unpaid interest and principal is due on June 5, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest is paid in arrears and payments began on August 1, 2014, and are due on the first day of each calendar month thereafter. Principal payments begin on January 1, 2015 and are due on the first day of each calendar month thereafter based on an amortization schedule with the principal balance due on the Maturity Date. The loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part prior to June 5, 2016, thereafter, the Company, at its option, may prepay the loan at any time, in whole (but not in part) on at least 30 calendar days’, but not more than 60 calendar days’, advance written notice. The prepayment amount will be equal to the outstanding principal balance of the loan, any accrued and unpaid interest and all other fees, expenses and obligations including an early termination fee of $301,200. The Company made principal payments in the amount of $311,536 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. No principal payments were made for the four months ended December 31, 2014. The note balance as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $14,748,464 and $15,060,000, respectively. Interest expense on this note was $679,987 and $252,644 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015, scheduled principal payments due for each fiscal year ended December 31 are listed below as follows:

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company’s charter authorizes the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company has 500,000,000 of authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were 250,000 outstanding common shares outstanding, respectively.

Effective November 7, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “common stock”), from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000 and effected a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock at the ratio of 1-for-400 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As of December 31, 2014 and August 31, 2014, there were 250,000 outstanding common shares. All references to shares of the Company’s common stock in Report refer to the number of shares of common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split (unless otherwise indicated).

Pursuant to a previously declared dividend approved by the Board of Directors and in compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Company has paid a monthly dividend of $0.0852 per share, an aggregate of $21,300 per month, each month during the twelve month period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and also during the four month period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Accordingly, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $255,600. During the four months ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid total dividends to holders of its common stock in the amount of $85,200.

As disclosed in Note 11 – “Subsequent Events,” on March 2, 2016, ZH USA, LLC converted $15,000,000 of principal under the Convertible Debenture into 1,176,656 shares of our unregistered common stock. Shares of our unregistered common stock issuable to ZH USA, LLC under the Convertible Debenture are subject to customary anti-dilution rights in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events. The Convertible Debenture was issued in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Allocated General and Administrative Expenses

In the future, the Company may receive an allocation of general and administrative expenses from the Advisor that are either clearly applicable to or were reasonably allocated to the operations of the properties. There were no allocated general and administrative expenses from the Advisor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or for the four months ended December 31, 2014.

Convertible Debenture, due to Majority Stockholder

The Company has received funds from its majority stockholder ZH USA, LLC in the form of convertible interest bearing (8% per annum, payable in arrears) due on demand unsecured debt, which are classified as “Convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company may prepay the note at any time, in whole or in part. ZH USA, LLC may elect to convert all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the note into shares of common stock in an amount equal to the principal amount of the note, together with accrued but unpaid interest, divided by $12.748.

A rollforward of the funding from ZH USA, LLC classified as convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the funding from ZH USA, LLC classified as convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Interest expense on the convertible debenture was $581,342 and $142,436 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, respectively.

The Company analyzed the conversion option in the convertible debenture for derivative accounting treatment under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and determined that the instrument does not qualify for derivative accounting. The Company therefore performed an analysis in accordance with ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options,” to determine if the conversion option was subject to a beneficial conversion feature and determined that the instrument does not have a beneficial conversion feature.  

Note Payable to Majority Stockholder

The Company has received funds from its majority stockholder ZH USA, LLC in the form of a non-interest bearing due on demand note payable, which is classified as “Note payable to majority stockholder” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

A rollforward of the funding from the majority stockholder as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the funding from the majority stockholder as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Due to Related Parties, Net

A rollforward of the due (to) from related parties balance, net as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the due (to) from related parties balance, net as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Management Agreement

On November 10, 2014, the Company entered into a Management Agreement, with an effective date of April 1, 2014, with Inter-American Management, LLC (the “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company and an affiliate of the Company. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for designing and implementing our business strategy and administering our business activities and day-to-day operations. For performing these services, the Company will pay the Advisor a base management fee equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum of the Company’s net asset value (the value of the Company’s assets less the value of the Company’s liabilities), or (b) $30,000 per calendar month. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, management fees of $360,000 and $120,000, respectively, were incurred and expensed by the Company, due to the Advisor, and remain unpaid as of December 31, 2015. Additionally, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company expensed $400,000 and $227,000 that were paid to the Advisor for the acquisitions of the Tennessee facilities and the West Mifflin facility, respectively. For the four months ended December 31, 2014 the Company expensed $48,400 that was paid to the Advisor related to the acquisition of the Asheville facility in September 2014.

Note 7 – Rental Revenue

The aggregate annual minimum cash to be received by the Company on the noncancelable operating leases related to its portfolio of facilities in effect as of December 31, 2015, are as follows for the subsequent years ended December 31; as listed below.

The Omaha facility constituted approximately 80% of the Company’s rental revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the West Mifflin and Asheville facilities constituted approximately 10% each. The Omaha facility constituted approximately 90% of the Company’s rental revenue for the four months ended December 31, 2014 and the Asheville facility constituted approximately 10%. The West Mifflin facility was not owned by the Company in 2014.

Note 8 – Omaha Land Lease Rent Expense

The Omaha facility land lease initially was to expire in 2023 with options to renew up to 60 years. However, as of December 31, 2015, the Company exercised two five-year lease renewal options and therefore the land lease currently expires in 2033, subject to future renewal options by the Company. Under the terms of the land lease, annual rents increase 12.5% every fifth anniversary of the lease. The initial land lease increase will occur in April 2017. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, the Company expensed $79,892 and $44,908 related to this lease. The aggregate minimum cash payments to be made by the Company on the non-cancelable Omaha facility related land lease in effect as of December 31, 2015, are as follows for the subsequent years ended December 31; as listed below.

Note 9 - Commitments and contingencies

Litigation

The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company, which if determined unfavorably to the Company, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Environmental Matters

The Company follows a policy of monitoring its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at its properties, the Company is not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to its properties that would have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Additionally, the Company is not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that management believes would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.

Note 10 – Income Taxes

For the 2016 tax year, the Company is planning to elect and qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.  To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its stockholders.  It is management’s current intention to adhere to these requirements and be eligible to be a REIT for the year ended December 31, 2016.  As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income currently distributed to stockholders.  If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT for the 2016 tax year, it will be subject to federal and state income taxes at corporate tax rates.  Even if the Company qualifies to be taxed as a REIT for 2016, it may be subject to federal and state taxes on any undistributed taxable income.  For the 2016 tax year, the Company intends to distribute all of its taxable income; therefore, no provision for federal or state income taxes has been recorded in the financial statements. 

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $1,352,000, which begin expiring in 2028. The Company has adopted ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC Topic 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for non-capital losses carried forward. The potential benefit of the net operating loss has not been recognized in these financial statements because it cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the loss carried forward in future years.

Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, after applying enacted corporate income tax rates, are as follows:

The Company periodically assesses the likelihood that it will be able to recover its deferred tax assets. The Company considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, including expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible profits. As a result of this analysis of all available evidence, both positive and negative, the Company concluded that it is not likely that its net deferred tax assets will ultimately be recovered; as such, it recorded a valuation allowance for the net operating loss and a reserve due to the anticipated REIT election for calendar year 2016.  

The Company follows ASC Topic 740 to recognize, measure, present and disclose in our consolidated financial statements uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any liabilities for uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in its financial statements. The Company is not subject and has not been subject to any federal or state income tax examinations.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

Cantor Loan

On March 31, 2016, through certain of our subsidiaries, we entered into a $32,097,400 portfolio commercial mortgage-backed securities loan (the “Cantor Loan”) with Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, LP (“CCRE”). The subsidiaries are GMR Melbourne, LLC, GMR Westland, LLC, GMR Memphis, LLC, and GMR Plano, LLC (“GMR Loan Subsidiaries”). The Cantor Loan has cross-default and cross-collateral terms. We used the proceeds of this loan to acquire the Melbourne Facility (Melbourne, FL) and the Michigan Facility (Westland, MI) and to refinance the assets from the acquisition of the facility in Plano, TX (the “Plano Facility”), and we granted a security interest in the assets from the facilities acquired from Gastroenterology Center of the Midsouth, P.C. (Memphis, TN) (the “Gastro One Facilities”).

The Cantor Loan has a maturity date of April 6, 2026 and accrues annual interest at 5.22%. The first five years of the term require interest only payments and after that payments will include interest and principal, amortized over a 30 year schedule. Prepayment can only occur within four months prior to the maturity date, except that after the earlier of (a) 2 years after the loan is placed in a securitized mortgage pool, or (ii) May 6, 2020, the Cantor Loan can be fully and partially defeased upon payment of amounts due under the Cantor Loan and payment of a defeasance amount that is sufficient to purchase U.S. government securities equal to the scheduled payments of principal, interest, fees, and any other amounts due related to a full or partial defeasance under the Cantor Loan.

We are securing the payment of the Cantor Loan with the assets, including property, facilities, and rents, held by the GMR Loan Subsidiaries.

We have agreed to guarantee certain customary recourse obligations, including findings of fraud, gross negligence, or breach of environmental covenants by GMR Loan Subsidiaries.

The GMR Loan Subsidiaries will be required to maintain monthly debt service coverage ratio of 1.35:1.00 for all of the collateral properties in the aggregate.

Completed Property Acquisitions Subsequent to December 31, 2015

Plano Acute Care

On January 28, 2016, the Company closed on an asset purchase agreement with an unrelated party Star Medreal, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, to acquire an approximately 24,000 square foot, eight bed acute hospital facility located in Plano, Texas, along with all real property and improvements thereto for approximately $17.5 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was obligated to pay a development fee of $500,000 to Lumin, LLC at closing. The property will be leased back via an absolute triple-net lease agreement that expires in 2036. The tenant will be Star Medical Center, LLC and Lumin Health, LLC will serve as guarantor. Lumin Health, LLC is an affiliate and management company for Star Medical Center, LLC. The tenant has two successive options to renew the lease for ten year periods on the same terms and conditions as the primary non-revocable lease term with the exception of rent, which will be computed at then prevailing fair market value as determined by an appraisal process defined in the lease. The terms of the lease also provide for a tenant allowance up to $2.75 million for a 6,400 square foot expansion to be paid by the Company.

On January 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Promissory Note and Deed of Trust with East West Bank to borrow the principal amount of $9,223,500. The loan matures on January 28, 2021, five years from the closing date. At closing the Company paid the lender a non-refundable deposit of $50,000.00 and a non-refundable commitment fee of $46,117.50. The loan shall bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (as quoted in the “Money Rates” column of The Wall Street Journal (Western Edition), rounded to two decimal places, as it may change from time to time, plus 0.50%, but not less than 4.0%. Loan payments will consist of both and interest and principal pay down component. The Company will begin making loan payments on March 10, 2016, and on the tenth day of each calendar month thereafter. The entire outstanding principal balance of the loan, together with accrued and unpaid interest and any other amounts due under the loan documents, will be due and payable on the maturity date. The Company may prepay the loan in full at any time, or in part from time to time, without premium or penalty.

Additional funding for this transaction was received from the Company’s majority stockholder during the year ended December 31, 2015 in the amount of $9,369,310 (consisting of $9,025,000 funded directly for this transaction and $344,310 that was in escrow from previous funding from the majority stockholder). The $9,369,310 was recorded by the Company as of December 31, 2015 as unsecured Convertible Debentures due to its majority stockholder on demand, bearing interest at eight percent per annum. The majority stockholder may elect to convert all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Debenture into shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount equal to the principal amount of the Convertible Debenture, together with accrued but unpaid interest, divided by $12.748.

Melbourne Facility

On March 31, 2016, the Company closed on a purchase agreement to acquire a 78,000 square-foot medical office building located on the Melbourne Bayfront for a purchase price of $15.45 million from Marina Towers, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. The facility is located at 709 S. Harbor City Blvd., Melbourne, FL on 1.9 acres of land. The acquisition includes the site and building, an easement on the adjacent property to the north for surface parking, all tenant leases, and above and below ground parking garages. The entire facility will be leased back to Marina Towers, LLC via a 10-year absolute triple-net master lease agreement that expires in 2026. The tenant has two successive options to renew the lease for five-year periods on the same terms and conditions as the primary non-revocable lease term with the exception of rent, which will be adjusted to the prevailing fair market rent at renewal and will escalate in successive years during the extended lease period at two percent annually.

Michigan Facility

On March 31, 2016, the Company closed on a purchase agreement to acquire a two-story medical office building and ambulatory surgery center located in Westland, Michigan. The property contains 15,018 leasable square feet and is located on a 1.3 acre site. Under the purchase agreement, the Company would acquire the site and building, including parking for an aggregate purchase price of $4.75 million. The entire facility will be leased back to The Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC under a triple-net master lease agreement that expires in 2026, subject to two successive ten-year renewal options for the tenant on the same terms as the initial lease, except that the rental rate will be subject to adjustment upon each renewal based on then-prevailing market rental rates. The purchase agreement contains customary covenants, representations and warranties. The Company’s due diligence period expires on March 28, 2016.

Dividends

On January 19, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business January 27, 2016. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law. The aggregate amount of the dividend was $21,300.

On February 17, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business February 26, 2016. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law. The aggregate amount of the dividend was $21,300.

On March 17, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business March 27, 2016. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law. The aggregate amount of the dividend was $21,300.

Common Stock Activity

On March 2, 2016, ZH USA, LLC converted $15,000,000 of principal under the Convertible Debenture into 1,176,656 shares of our unregistered common stock. Shares of our unregistered common stock issuable to ZH USA, LLC under the Convertible Debenture are subject to customary anti-dilution rights in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.

The Convertible Debenture was issued in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Formation of UPREIT Structure

On March 14, 2016, the Company entered into a series of internal agreements and transactions pursuant to which the Company has implemented an UPREIT operating partnership structure. The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Global Medical REIT GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “GP”), entered into an Agreement of Limited Partnership pursuant to which the Company serves as the initial limited partner, and the GP serves as the sole general partner, of the Company’s Operating Partnership, Global Medical REIT L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “OP”) (the “Partnership Agreement”). In addition, the Company entered into a Contribution and Assignment Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with the OP pursuant to which the Company contributed to the OP 100% of the limited liability company interests in two wholly owned subsidiaries that own certain of the Company’s properties in exchange for limited partnership units of the OP. These subsidiaries are GMR Plano, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and GMR Memphis, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The Company intends to contribute its ownership interests in the subsidiaries that own the Company’s other properties upon receipt of the required lender consents.

The Company is the sole member of the GP, which is the sole general partner of the OP. Going forward, the Company will conduct substantially all of its operations and make substantially all of its investments through the OP. Pursuant to the partnership agreement, through the GP, the Company will have full, complete and exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the OP, including the ability to cause the OP to enter into certain major transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, refinancings and selection of lessees, to make distributions to partners and to cause changes in the OP’s business activities.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Global Medical REIT Inc.

Bethesda, MD

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Global Medical REIT Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively the “Company”) as of August 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statement of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal controls over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company, as of August 31, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

MALONEBAILEY, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

May 19, 2016

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.
 Consolidated Balance Sheet

See accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.
 Consolidated Statement of Operations

See accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.
 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

See accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

See accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Organization and Operations

Global Medical REIT Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on March 18, 2011 under the name Scoop Media, Inc. The Company changed its name effective January 6, 2014 in connection with its conversion into a Maryland corporation and its plans to develop and manage a portfolio of healthcare real estate assets and properties.

On September 30, 2013, Xpress Group, Ltd., a Hong Kong company now known as Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. (“Heng Fai”) purchased 13,750 shares of the Common Stock of our company representing approximately 68.7% of its issued and outstanding common stock from Yukon Industries, Inc. for $55,000 payable in cash at closing. On December 10, 2013, Heng Fai agreed to purchase an aggregate of 6,250 common shares of Scoop Media, Inc. from various parties. Heng Fai purchased these common shares for $25,000. On March 5, 2014, Heng Fai acquired an additional 30,000 shares of our common stock at $0.00641 per share. Heng Fei owns an aggregate of 94.1% of our outstanding common stock.

As part of Heng Fai’s acquisition of a controlling interest in our company, we have determined to pursue a new strategy and intend to acquire real estate assets in the healthcare industry, which may include the real estate of hospitals, medical centers, nursing facilities and retirement homes.

Effective November 7, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “our common stock”) from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000 and effected a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock at the ratio of 1-for-400 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). All references to shares of the Company’s common stock in this report on Form 10-K refers to the number of shares of common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies

Use of estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash — Restricted cash of $137,501 represents cash required by a third party lender to be held by the Company as a reserve for debt service.

Income taxes — The Company plans on electing to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning in 2015. REITs are generally not subject to federal income taxes if the Company can meet many specific requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and we may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and if we create a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”), the TRS will be subject to federal, state and local taxes on its income at regular corporate rates. The Company recognizes the tax effects of uncertain tax positions only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company has not identified any material uncertain tax positions and recognizes interest and penalties in income tax expense, if applicable. The Company is currently not under examination by any income tax jurisdiction.

Purchase of real estate — Transactions in which real estate assets are purchased that are not subject to an existing significant lease or are attached or related to a major healthcare provider are treated as asset acquisitions, and as such are recorded at their purchase price, including acquisition fees, which is allocated to land and building based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Investment properties that are acquired either subject to a significant existing lease or as part of a portfolio level transaction with significant leasing activity are treated as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, and as such are recorded at fair value, allocated to land, building and the existing lease, if applicable, based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition, with acquisition fees and other costs expensed as incurred. Fair value is determined based on ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, primarily based on unobservable data inputs. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating the purchase price of individually acquired properties, the Company utilizes its own market knowledge and published market data. In this regard, the Company also utilizes information obtained from county tax assessment records to assist in the determination of the fair value of the land and building. The Company utilizes market comparable transactions such as price per square foot to assist in the determination of fair value for purposes of allocating the purchase price of properties acquired as part of portfolio level transactions. The value of acquired leases, if applicable, is estimated based upon the costs we would have incurred to lease the property under similar terms.

Impairment of long lived assets — The Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment periodically or whenever events or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment indicator exists, we compare the expected future undiscounted cash flows against the carrying amount of an asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we would record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset.

Depreciation expense — Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and improvements, which are generally between 5 and 40 years. Depreciation expense related to the real estate assets was approximately $129,081 for year ended August 31, 2014.

Cash and cash equivalents — The Company considers all demand deposits, cashier’s checks, money market accounts and certificates of deposits with a maturity of three months to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains their cash and cash equivalents and escrow deposits at financial institutions. The combined account balances may exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage, and, as a result, there may be a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit. The Company does not believe that this risk is significant.

Escrow deposits — Escrow deposits include refundable and non-refundable cash earnest money deposits for the purchase of properties including advances from Heng Fai Enterprises. In addition, escrow deposits may include amounts paid for properties in certain states which require a judicial order when the risk and rewards of ownership of the property are transferred and the purchase is finalized.

Revenue recognition — The Company’s operations consist of rental revenue earned from one tenant under a leasing arrangement which provides for minimum rent, escalations, and charges to the tenant for the real estate taxes and operating expenses. The lease has been accounted for as the operating lease. For operating leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue amounts which differ from those that are contractually due from tenants. If the Company determines that collectability of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, future revenue recognition is limited to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, an allowance for estimated losses is established.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for operating lease straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on a continuous basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For operating lease straight-line rent amounts, the Company’s assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease. As of August 31, 2014, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts.

Deferred financing costs — Deferred financing costs include amounts paid to lenders and others to obtain financing and are amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan which approximates the effective interest method. The Company incurred deferred financing costs of $335,986 for the year ended August 31, 2014 related to its loan with Capital One (See Note 4). Amortization of these deferred financing costs was $26,443 for the year ended August 31, 2014, resulting in a net balance of $309,543.

Segment reporting — ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity’s reportable segments. The Company has determined that they have one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in medical office buildings. Their investments in real estate are in the same geographic region and management evaluates operating performance on an individual asset level.

Fair value of financial instruments — Fair value is a market-based measurement, and should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The Company considers the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, escrow deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time since origination or the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments. The fair value of accounts payable due to affiliates is not determinable due to the related party nature of the accounts payable.

Recently issued and adopted accounting standards — In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations such as a major line of business, major geographic area or a major equity method investment, should be presented as discontinued operations. In addition the new guidance will require expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. The guidance will be effective for all disposals of components (or classifications as held for sale) that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 3 — Property Acquisition

On June 5, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of a 56-bed long term acute care hospital located at 1870 S 75th Street, Omaha, Nebraska for approximately $21,700,000 (approximately $21.9 million after including legal fees) (the “Omaha Facility”). The Omaha Facility is operated by Select Specialty Hospital — Omaha, Inc. pursuant to a sublease which expires in 2023, with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years (the “operating lease”). Also, the real property where the Omaha Facility and other improvements are located are subject to a land lease with Catholic Health Initiatives, a Colorado nonprofit corporation (the “land lease”). The land lease expires in 2023 with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years.

When at the date of acquisition an acquired property has an existing tenant the Company accounts for its acquisition of real estate in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Accounting for Business Combinations, Goodwill, and Other Intangible Assets, which requires the purchase price of acquired properties be allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, and identified intangible assets, based in each case on their fair values. The Company identified no intangible assets in connection with its acquisition of the Omaha Facility.

Note 4 — Debt

In order to finance a portion of the purchase price for the Omaha Facility, on June 5, 2014 the Company entered into a Term Loan and Security Agreement with Capital One, National Association (the “Lender”) to borrower $15,060,000 (the “Loan”). The Loan bears interest at 4.91% per annum and all unpaid interest and principal is due on June 5, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest is paid in arrears and payments begin on August 1, 2014, and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter. Principal payments begin on January 1, 2015 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter based on an amortization schedule with the principal balance due on the Maturity Date. The Loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part prior to June 5, 2016, thereafter, the Company, at its option, may prepay the Loan at any time, in whole (but not in part) on at least thirty (30) calendar days but not more than sixty (60) calendar days advance written notice. The prepayment amount will be equal to the outstanding principal balance of the Loan, any accrued and unpaid interest and all other fees, expenses and obligations including an Early Termination Fee of $301,200.

At Closing, the Company paid the Lender a non-refundable commitment fee of $150,600. If any principal, interest or other sum due by the Company is not paid on the date on which it is due, the Company is obligated to pay to the Lender an amount equal to the lesser of five percent (5%) of such unpaid sum or the maximum amount permitted by applicable laws (the “Late Payment Charge”). All fees hereunder are non-refundable and deemed fully earned when due and payable.

The Company’s obligation under the Term Loan and Security Agreement are secured by: (1) a first priority perfected security interest in all tangible and intangible existing and future personal property and real property of the Company.

The Term Loan and Security Agreement contains covenants that are customary for similar credit arrangements. These include covenants relating to establishment of reserves for the payment of taxes, insurance and capital replacements (under certain circumstances), maintaining a collection account, financial reporting and notification, payment of indebtedness, taxes and other obligations, and compliance with certain applicable laws. There are also financial covenants that require the Company to (i) maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges for the four most recent fiscal quarters) of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 and (ii) maintain a EBITDA for each fiscal year of at least $2,800,000. The Term Loan and Security Agreement also imposes certain customary limitations and requirements on the Company with respect to, among other things, the maintenance of properties, access to real property, insurance, compliance with laws, maintenance of books and records, inspection rights, environmental matters, indemnity, healthcare operations, right of first refusal for future financing, incurrence of indebtedness and liens, the making of investments, the payment of distributions or making of other restricted payments, healthcare matters, mergers, acquisitions and dispositions of assets, and transactions with affiliates.

The Term Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation: non-payment of obligations under the Term Loan and Security Agreement when due; the material inaccuracy of any representations or warranties; a violation of covenants in the Term Loan and Security Agreement (subject, in the case of certain such covenants, to cure periods); a default related to other material debt or uninsured loss in excess of $100,000; certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency; judgments for the payment of money in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate that remains unpaid or unstayed and undischarged for a period of 30 days after the date on which the right to appeal has expired; and a change of control of the Company. The occurrence and continuance of an event of default could result in, among other things, amounts owing under the Term Loan and Security Agreement being accelerated, payment of the Early Termination Fee and the Term Loan and Security Agreement being terminated.

The Company incurred deferred financing costs of $335,986 for the year ended August 31, 2014 related to this loan.

During the continuance of any default, the applicable interest rate on all obligations owing under the Term Loan and Security Agreement is the lesser of (a) the maximum rate permitted by applicable law; or (b) 3% per annum over the current interest rate otherwise applicable.

Scheduled principal payments due on debt as of August 31, 2014, are as follows:

Note 5 — Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock — The Company’s charter authorizes them to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of August 31, 2014, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Common stock — The Company’s charter authorizes them to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of August 31, 2014, there were 250,000 outstanding common stock shares.

On September 30, 2013, Xpress Group, Ltd., a Hong Kong company now known as Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd. (“Heng Fai”) purchased 13,750 shares of the Common Stock of our company representing approximately 68.7% of its issued and outstanding common stock from Yukon Industries, Inc. for $55,000 payable in cash at closing. On December 10, 2013, Heng Fai agreed to purchase an aggregate of 6,250 common shares of Scoop Media, Inc. from various parties. Heng Fai purchased these common shares for $25,000. On March 5, 2014, Heng Fai acquired an additional 30,000 shares of our common stock at $0.00641 per share. Heng Fei owns an aggregate of 94.1% of our outstanding common stock.

As discussed in Note 6, on July 17, 2014, the Company agreed to issue 230,000 shares of its unregister common stock upon conversion of $2,932,040 principal amount and interest due of the Convertible debenture held by HFE USA, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Heng Fai. Heng Fai assigned the convertible debenture to HFE USA, LLC on July 17, 2014.

On July 17, 2014, the Company announced that its Board declared a one-time dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record as of the close of business on July 31, 2014.

On August 19, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business August 29, 2014. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law.

Total dividends paid to stockholders during the year ended August 31, 2014 were $42,620.

Note 6 — Related Party Transactions

Management agreement — On November 10, 2014 the Company entered into a Management Agreement, with an effective date of April 1, 2014, with Inter-American Management LLC (the “Manager”), a Delaware limited liability company and an affiliate of the Company. Under the terms of the Management Agreement the Manager is responsible for designing and implementing our business strategy and administering our business activities and day-to-day operations. For performing these services, the Company will pay the Manager a base management fee equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum of the Company’s net asset value (the value of the Company’s assets less the value of the Company’s liabilities), or (b) $30,000 per calendar month. For the year ended August 31, 2014, management fees of $213,000 were due to the Manager. As of August 31, 2014, $213,000 remains unpaid and is recorded as due to related parties in the accompanying balance sheet at August 31, 2014. Additionally, the Company expensed $434,200 that was paid to the Manager related to loan costs for the acquisition of the Omaha Facility. This expense is included in the general and administrative line item in the accompanying statements of operations for the year ended August 31, 2014.

Allocated general and administrative expenses — In the future, the Company may receive an allocation of general and administrative expenses from the Manager that are either clearly applicable to or were reasonably allocated to the operations of the properties. There were no allocated general and administrative expenses from the Manager for the year ended August 31, 2014.

Note payable to majority stockholder — Heng Fai, the majority stockholder, loaned the Company $7,468,142 to assist in the acquisition of the Omaha Facility and pay closing costs. The loan was unsecured, due on demand, and bore no interest. On July 1, 2014, the Company converted the entire balance of the Heng Fai loan into a Convertible Debenture (the “Convertible Debenture”). The Convertible Debenture bears interest at 8.0% per annum and all unpaid interest and principal is due on June 30, 2015. Interest is paid monthly in arrears and payments begin on July 31, 2014, and on the last day of each calendar month thereafter. The Company may prepay the note at any time, in whole or in part. Heng Fai may elect to convert all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the note into shares of common stock in an amount equal to the principal amount of the note, together with accrued but unpaid interest, divided by $12.748.

On July 17, 2014, Heng Fai elected to convert $2,932,040 of the principal and accrued interest under the note into 230,000 shares of our unregistered common stock. Shares of our unregistered common stock issued to Heng Fai as a result of these conversions will be subject to customary anti-dilution rights in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.

As of August 31, 2014, the outstanding principal balance of the Convertible Debenture was $4,536,102. Interest expense was $91,468 for the year ended August 31, 2014. Also during the year ended August 31, 2014, $345,053 was loaned to the Company to be used for general corporate purposes. The Company repaid $306,858 of this loan leaving a note payable to stockholder balance of $38,195 at August 31, 2014.

Note 7 — Rental Revenue

The aggregate annual minimum cash payments to be received on the noncancelable operating lease in effect as of August 31, 2014 are as follows:

Of the total rental revenue for the year ended August 31, 2014, 100% was earned from one tenant who is the operator for the medical facility, and the operating lease expires in 2023, with sub lessee options to renew up to 60 years. The tenant’s obligations under the lease are guaranteed by its parent company, Select Medical Corporation (NYSE: SEM). The guarantor, Select Medical Corporation, is one of the largest specialty hospital and outpatient rehabilitation center operators in the United States. According to its Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2013, Select Medical Corporation reported net operating revenues of $2,975.6 million. Of this total, 74% of net operating revenues was derived from its specialty hospital segment and approximately 26% from its outpatient rehabilitation segment, operating 123 facilities throughout 28 states, of which 108 are Long Term Acute Care Hospitals including the Omaha Facility.

Note 8 — Rent Expense

The land lease expires in 2023 with options to renew up to 60 years. Under the terms of the land lease, annual rents increase 12.5 percent every fifth anniversary of the lease. The next land lease increase will occur in April 2017. The aggregate minimum cash payments to be paid on the non-cancelable land lease in effect as of August 31, 2014 are as follows:

Note 9 — Commitments and contingencies

Litigation — The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to their knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against them, which if determined unfavorably to them, would have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Environmental matters — The Company follows a policy of monitoring their properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at their properties, they are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to their properties that would have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, they are not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that they believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.

Note 10 — Income Taxes

For the 2014 tax year, the Company is planning to elect and qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its stockholders. It is management’s current intention to adhere to these requirements and be eligible to be a REIT for the year ended December 31, 2014. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income currently distributed to stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT for the 2014 tax year, it will be subject to federal and state income taxes at corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies to be taxed as a REIT for 2014, it may be subject to federal and state taxes on any undistributed taxable income. For the 2014 tax year, the Company intends to distribute all of its taxable income; therefore, no provision for federal or state income taxes has been recorded in the financial statements.

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has incurred a net operating loss of approximately $535,000 which begins expiring in 2028. The Company has adopted ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for non-capital losses carried forward. The potential benefit of the net operating loss has not been recognized in these financial statements because it cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the loss carried forward in future years.

Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of August 31, 2014, after applying enacted corporate income tax rates, are as follows:

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

The Company follows ASC Topic 740 to recognize, measure, present and disclose in our consolidated financial statements uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return. As of August 31, 2014, the Company did not have any liabilities for uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in its financial statements. The Company is not subject and has not been subject to any federal or state income tax examinations.

Note 11 — Subsequent Events

Acquisition — On September 19, 2014, the Company entered into and closed an Agreement of Sale and Purchase to acquire an approximately 8,840 square foot medical office building known as the Orthopedic Surgery Center, located in Asheville, North Carolina for approximately $2.52 million. The acquisition was funded by cash and borrowings. The Ashville facility is subject to an operating lease which expires in 2017, with lease options to renew up to five years. The property is owned fee simple.

In connection with the acquisition of the Ashville facility in September 2014 the Company borrowed $1.7 million from the Bank of North Carolina. Interest is fixed at 4.75% for the term of the loan, which is due in full, including all accrued and unpaid interest on February 15, 2017.

Board of director and officer appointments — On October 1, 2014, the Board of Directors appointed David Young, Tong Wan Chan, and Jeffrey Busch as directors. On the same day, the Board also appointed Donald McClure as the Chief Financial Officer.

Management agreement — On November 10, 2014 the Company entered into a Management Agreement, with an effective date of April 1, 2014, with Inter-American Management LLC (the “Manager”), a Delaware limited liability company and an affiliate of the Company.

Services Performed.  Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Manager will manage, operate and administer the Company’s day-to-day operations and investment activities in conformity with the investment guidelines and other policies that are approved and monitored by our board of directors. Our Manager is responsible for (1) the selection, purchase and sale of our portfolio investments, (2) potentially providing property management and development activities, and (3) providing us with investment advisory services. The initial term of the Management Agreement expires on October 1, 2019 and will be automatically renewed for five year periods thereafter. The Manager is permitted to market additional goods and services to tenants of the properties owned by the Company.

Compensation.  The Company will pay the Manager a base management fee equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum of the Company’s net asset value (the value of the Company’s assets less the value of the Company’s liabilities), or (b) $30,000 per calendar month. In addition, the Company will pay the Manager an Acquisition Fee equal to 2.00% of the purchase price of any real estate asset acquired by Manager. The Acquisition Fee shall be paid at the closing of any real estate acquisition. The Manager is also entitled to an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”) for each calendar quarter the Management Agreement is in effect beginning on April 1, 2014 in an amount, not less than zero, equal to the difference between (1) the product of (a) 20% and (b) the difference between (i) Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous four fiscal quarters, and (ii) the product of (A) the weighted-average offering price per share of common stock of all of the Company’s offerings of common stock (other than offerings of common stock to the Company or its Affiliates that are not part of a broader offering of common stock to third party investors) (where each such offering is weighted by both the number of shares issued in such offering and the number of days that such issued shares were outstanding during such four fiscal quarter period) multiplied by the average number of common stock outstanding in the previous four fiscal quarters, and (B) 8%, and (2) the sum of any Incentive Compensation paid to the Manager with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous four fiscal quarter period; provided, however, that no Incentive Compensation shall be payable with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative Core Earnings for the 12 most-recently completed fiscal quarters (or part thereof prior to the completion of 12 fiscal quarters following the Closing Date) is greater than zero.

Core Earnings is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as the net income (loss) of the Company, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding non-cash equity compensation expense, the Incentive Compensation, real estate-related depreciation and amortization, any unrealized gains or losses or other non-cash items that are included in net income for the applicable reporting period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income and one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain non-cash charges, in each case after discussions between the Manager and the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Base Management Fee shall be payable in arrears in cash, in quarterly installments commencing with the fiscal quarter in which this Agreement is executed. The Incentive Compensation shall be payable in arrears, in quarterly installments commencing with the fiscal quarter ending April 1, 2014.

Operating Expenses.  The Company is required to pay all of its operating expenses which include, but are not limited to, transactions costs, legal, accounting, and administrative services, compensation of the Company’s officers and directors, costs and out of pocket expense incurred by directors, officer, employees or other agents of the Manager for travel on the Company’s behalf, wages, salaries and benefits incurred by the Manager for dedicated officers that are provided to the Company or a pro-rata portion if such person is partially dedicated to the Company’s operations. The Company has agreed to reimburse the Manager for any operating expenses of the Company incurred by the Manager.

Termination Rights.  The Management Agreement can be terminated if the Company fails to exceed (A) 75% (seventy-five percent) of the FTSE NAREIT Equity Health Care (as defined below) total performance and dividend performance over the three year period previous to termination (the Manager shall have the right to forgo or defer any fees due to it in order to achieve the 75% benchmark); and (B) 75% (seventy-five percent) of the FTSE NAREIT Equity Health Care (as defined below) total performance and dividend performance over the one year period previous to termination (the Manager shall have the right to forgo or defer any Fees due to it in order to achieve the 75% benchmark); and (C) 75% (seventy-five percent) of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index total performance and dividend performance over the three year period previous to termination (the Manager shall have the right to forgo or defer any Fees due to it in order to achieve the 75% benchmark); and (D) 75% (seventy-five percent) of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index total performance and dividend performance over the one year period previous to termination (the Manager shall have the right to forgo or defer any Fees due to it in order to achieve the 75% benchmark); and (E) “total performance” is defined as share price appreciation plus dividends paid to the stockholder expressed as an annualized percentage of all index constituents weighted in the same ratio as they are weighed by the index; and (F) “dividend performance” is defined as dividends paid to the stockholder expressed as an annualized percentage of all index constituents weighted in the same ratio as they are weighed by the index.

In addition, the Management Agreement can only be terminated if the Company fails to exceed 5.0% return on invested capital for the previous 12 months, and if the Board of Directors of the Company: (A) is comprised of at least seven members; (B) and other than directors placed by the Manager or its affiliate, Heng Fai Enterprises Ltd., no more than one director is represented, employed, or affiliated by any single investor or investment, bank, law firm, or vendor; and (C) in a fully attended Board meeting, votes to terminate the Agreement in a majority vote; and the Company’s stockholders approve, by a majority of stockholders, an alternative business plan submitted by the Board of Directors through a stockholder vote as provided for in the Management Agreement; and upon the termination the Company will pay the Manager the Termination Fee (as defined below) in cash, common stock, or fifty percent cash and fifty percent common stock.

FTSE NAREIT Equity Health Care means the REIT health care real estate index which is a component of the FTSE NAREIT U.S. Real Estate Index Series published on REIT.com.

In addition, the Manager may terminate the Management Agreement on 60 days’ notice in the event the Company shall default on any term or condition of the agreement and the Company fails to remedy such default within 30 days of such notice. In the event of a default, the Company is obligated to pay the Manager a termination fee (the “Termination Fee”) equal to the greater of (a) three (3) times the average annual Base Management Fee and the average annual Incentive Compensation (in either case paid or payable) to the Manager with respect to the previous eight fiscal quarters ending on the last day of the Final Quarter; and (b) the greater of: (i) 10% (ten percent) of the FFO growth (as defined below) from October 1, 2013 to the date of the termination; or (ii) 10% (ten percent) of capital gains of the Company measured from the period October 1, 2013 to the date of termination. A mutually agreed upon third party shall conduct an appraisal of the Company’s assets. FFO means the Company’s net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. The termination fee is payable in cash, common stock of the Company or fifty percent cash, fifty percent common stock of the Company.

Reverse stock split — Effective November 7, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “our common stock”) from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000 and effected a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock at the ratio of 1-for-400 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). All references to shares of the Company’s common stock in this report on Form 10-K refers to the number of shares of common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split (unless otherwise indicated).

Dividends — On September 19, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business September 29, 2014. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law.

On October 18, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business October 30, 2014. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law.

On November 21, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.0852 per share payable to the holders of its common stock of record at the close of business December 2, 2014. Dividends shall be paid no later than the 20^th day of the following month subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related information. Management uses its best judgment to ensure that the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in material respects, our financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the reported financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequate and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal controls including the possibility of human error and overriding of controls. Consequently, an ineffective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to reporting financial information.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to maintaining records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that the receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with our management and directors’ authorization; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention of or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Under the supervision of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission published in 1992 and subsequent guidance prepared by SEC specifically for smaller reporting companies. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2015.  

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

As of December 31, 2014, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to an identified material weakness. The material weakness related to a lack of controls over the preparation and filing of our Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2014, that resulted in the Form 10-Q not being filed by the required deadline, due to the Company’s misinterpretation of the transitional filing requirements related to the changing of the Company’s fiscal year end to a calendar year end.  This material weakness was an event isolated to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 as the transitional filing requirements were not applicable for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

None.

PART III

Directors and Executive Officers

As a Maryland corporation, we operate under the oversight of our Board of Directors. Each of our directors serves until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until her or his successor is duly elected and qualified. Any director may resign at any time and may be removed by the stockholders for cause upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting called for the purpose of the proposed removal. Unless filled by a vote of the stockholders as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, a vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors or the death, resignation, removal, adjudicated incompetence or other incapacity of a director may be filled by a vote of a majority of the remaining directors.

We are an “externally managed” REIT, which means that we have contracted with our Advisor to manage our day-to-day affairs and the acquisition and disposition of our assets, subject to our board’s supervision. Although our Board of Directors will make the ultimate decision with respect to the purchase and sale of properties, each of the members of our current Board of Directors is also an employee, member of the Board, or a member of the board of the entity that controls our Advisor, or holds a number of these positions. Our management agreement states that our Advisor shall have the right to nominate and place one director with the Company and that Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd shall have the right to nominate and place two directors with the Company. The management agreement also states that the Company shall have a cap of seven directors. Our Advisor is currently waiving the requirement that the Company have a cap of seven directors.

If we apply for listing on a national exchange, we would be required to restructure our board so that a majority of its members are “independent” in accordance with the listing standards of the national exchange on which our common stock becomes listed, meaning that, among other things, a majority of our directors would be required to be unaffiliated with our Advisor and its members.

As of December 31, 2015, we had nine directors. The following table provides information about our directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2015.

The following are biographical summaries of the experience of our executive officers and directors as of December 31, 2015.

On July 6, 2015, Mr. Fai Chan and Mr. Tong Wan Chan resigned from the Board of Directors of Global Medical REIT, Inc. Their resignations were not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to its operation, policies (including accounting or financial policies) or practices. Both resignations related to their disposition of ownership and control of Heng Fai Enterprises, Ltd., the Company’s majority stockholder.

Board Committees

Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent and we are not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an audit committee or other committees of our Board of Directors.

We have not established any committees, including an audit committee, a compensation committee or a nominating committee, or any committee performing a similar function. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by the Board of Directors as a whole.

We do not have a policy regarding the consideration of any director candidates which may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates, nor has our Board of Directors established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees. We have not adopted a policy regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed. Our Board has not considered or adopted any of these policies as we have never received a recommendation from any stockholder for any candidate to serve on our Board of Directors. While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all members of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees. In considering a director nominee, it is likely that our Board will consider the professional and/or educational background of any nominee with a view towards how this person might bring a different viewpoint or experience to our Board.

None of our directors is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee or Board of Directors who:

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

As a non-listed company, we are not required to have, and we currently do not have, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; however, we intend to adopt a code of ethics during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Since none of our securities have been registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock are not required to file Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reports.

Executive Compensation

Because our management agreement provides that our Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs, our executive officers, who are all employees of our Advisor, do not receive cash compensation directly from us for serving as our executive officers. However, in their capacities as officers or employees of our Advisor, or its affiliates, they devote a portion of their time to our affairs as is required for the performance of the duties of our Advisor under the management agreement.

Our Advisor compensates each of our executive officers. We do not pay or provide benefits, nor do we reimburse the cost of any compensation or benefits paid by our Advisor or its affiliates to our executive officers and directors. We pay our Advisor a management fee, and our Advisor uses the proceeds from the management fee in part to pay compensation to its officers and employees. Our Advisor has informed us that, because the services performed by these officers or employees in their capacities as such are performed in a significant part, but not exclusively, for us, it cannot segregate and identify that portion of the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our executive officers by our Advisor that relates solely to their services to us.

Tabular presentation that sets forth certain compensation information for: (i) our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity during our fiscal year ended December 15, 2015; (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2015 whose compensation exceed $100,000; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at December 31, 2015, is not presented for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, as the amount of services dedicated to the Company by these executives resulted in immaterial compensation.

There are no stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and director other than as described herein.

Equity Awards

We have not awarded any shares of stock, options or other equity securities to our directors or executive officers since our inception. We have not adopted any equity incentive plan.  There were no grants of stock options since inception.

The Board of Directors has not adopted a stock incentive plan. If such a plan is adopted, this may be administered by the board or a committee appointed by the board. The committee would have the power to modify, extend or renew outstanding options and to authorize the grant of new options in substitution therefore, provided that any such action may not impair any rights under any option previously granted. The Company may develop an incentive based stock option plan for its officers and directors and may reserve up to 10% of its outstanding shares of common stock for that purpose.

Director Compensation

Our directors are not compensated for their services. All our directors are compensated by affiliates of the Company or our Advisor.  The board has not implemented a plan to award options to our directors. There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the Board of Directors. We have no director's service contracts.

Employment Contracts

We have no employment contracts with any of our officers or directors.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards

We do not have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance.

Indemnification

Under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a law suit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney's fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

The following tables set forth certain information, as of March 21, 2016, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock and preferred stock by (i) any holder of more than five percent, (ii) each of our executive officers and directors, and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each person listed is in care of Global Medical REIT, Inc., 4800 Montgomery Lane #450, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. The information provided herein is based upon a list of our stockholders and our records with respect to the ownership of common stock. The percentages in the table have been calculated on the basis of treating as outstanding for a particular person, all shares of our common stock outstanding on that date and all shares of our common stock issuable to that holder in the event of exercise of outstanding options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges owned by that person at that date which are exercisable within 60 days of that date. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent that power may be shared with a spouse.

Common Stock

(1) Based on 3,390,112 shares of common stock outstanding and shares issuable to ZH USA, LLC as of March 21, 2016.

(2) The amount beneficially owned by Mr. Zhang and his spouse Ms. Huang consists of 1,425,481 shares owned by ZH USA, LLC as of March 21, 2016 and 1,963,456 shares issuable to ZH USA, LLC pursuant to a convertible debenture. Mr. Zhang and Ms. Huang have voting and dispositive control over securities held by ZH USA, LLC, whose address is 24/F Wyndham Place, 40-44 Wyndham Street, Central, Hong Kong, PRC.

Allocated General and Administrative Expenses

In the future, the Company may receive an allocation of general and administrative expenses from the Advisor that are either clearly applicable to or were reasonably allocated to the operations of the properties. There were no allocated general and administrative expenses from the Advisor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or for the four months ended December 31, 2014.

Convertible Debenture, due to Majority Stockholder

The Company has received funds from its majority stockholder ZH USA, LLC in the form of convertible interest bearing (8% per annum, payable in arrears) due on demand unsecured debt, which are classified as “Convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company may prepay the note at any time, in whole or in part. ZH USA, LLC may elect to convert all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the note into shares of common stock in an amount equal to the principal amount of the note, together with accrued but unpaid interest, divided by $12.748.

A rollforward of the funding from ZH USA, LLC classified as convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the funding from ZH USA, LLC classified as convertible debenture, due to majority stockholder as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Interest expense on the convertible debenture was $581,342 and $142,436 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, respectively.

The Company analyzed the conversion option in the convertible debenture for derivative accounting treatment under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and determined that the instrument does not qualify for derivative accounting. The Company therefore performed an analysis in accordance with ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options,” to determine if the conversion option was subject to a beneficial conversion feature and determined that the instrument does not have a beneficial conversion feature.  

Note Payable to Majority Stockholder

The Company has received funds from its majority stockholder ZH USA, LLC in the form of a non-interest bearing due on demand note payable, which is classified as “Note payable to majority stockholder” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

A rollforward of the funding from the majority stockholder as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the funding from the majority stockholder as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Due to Related Parties, Net

A rollforward of the due (to) from related parties balance, net as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

A rollforward of the due (to) from related parties balance, net as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:

Management Agreement

On November 10, 2014, the Company entered into a Management Agreement, with an effective date of April 1, 2014, with Inter-American Management, LLC (the “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company and an affiliate of the Company. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for designing and implementing our business strategy and administering our business activities and day-to-day operations. For performing these services, the Company will pay the Advisor a base management fee equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum of the Company’s net asset value (the value of the Company’s assets less the value of the Company’s liabilities), or (b) $30,000 per calendar month. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and the four months ended December 31, 2014, management fees of $360,000 and $120,000, respectively, were incurred and expensed by the Company, due to the Advisor, and remain unpaid as of December 31, 2015. Additionally, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 the Company expensed $400,000 and $227,000 that were paid to the Advisor for the acquisitions of the Tennessee facilities and the West Mifflin facility, respectively. For the four months ended December 31, 2014 the Company expensed $48,400 that was paid to the Advisor related to the acquisition of the Asheville facility in September 2014.

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided by Malone Bailey, LLP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, four months ended December 31, 2014, and the twelve months ended August 31, 2014.

Audit Fees — This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees — This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the SEC and other accounting consulting.

Tax Fees — This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items, such as audits of our financial results that are required by our majority stockholder in order to consolidate our results with theirs.

PART IV

GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.

Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2015

Note that none of the facilities had encumbrances, costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition, land held for development, or development / construction in progress costs, and therefore columns are not included in the table above for these items.

A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation is as follows:

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the date indicated.